
D300 quality pro-am imaging
7 of 7 people found this review helpful.
I've previously had a D70s. The first thing I noticed about the D300 is the image quality, which is simply in a different league for the same lenses. The camera feels more solid, is slightly larger and heavier, and has a lot more controls. I haven't really missed the simpler controls of the D70s, though I think I could spend more time fiddling with the settings and might miss the occasional wildlife shot as a result.
It's an easy thing, but I really like having to pop up the built in flash when I want to use it, not when the camera thinks I need it as in most modes on the D70s. With the increased ISO range of the D300, I can take quite decent hand-held shots in artificial light without the flash anyway!
The second big thing I noticed is how much more detail is available in the LCD, which is a massive 3 inches (diagonal). The third was the in-camera image enhancement, which turns what would have been dull photos taken in poor light into ones with life and energy.
A serious gotcha in my opinion is the software that comes with the camera: although NX Transfer and NX View are supplied, to view the RAW mode (NEF) images within Windows needs the installation of additional drivers, and to load the images into Photoshop CS2 appears not to be supported. So I either have to buy CS3, quite expensive, or buy the full version of NX Capture (around £120) and transfer each image I want to process in Photoshop as a TIFF.
I quite liked PictureProject, which came with the D70s, though this doesn't handle NEFs well either (my version 1.7 crashes with images from the D300 - I haven't tried playing with the settings or plug-ins yet).
Review ID: 10000000008275670

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.