
500D . . . electable!

A replacement for a Canon 20D which I loved but was very heavy and bulky, I wonder at the ability of Canon to squeeze so much into what is a very manageable DSLR. Torn between this and the 50D, I decided that this one offered the handling qualities I wanted - it really is very comfortable and quite light, it's the lenses which seem to add disproportional bulk! However, with fairly standard lenses (I have EF-S 17-85 IS USM and EF-S 55-250 IS) it is still a well balanced piece of kit.
Another real attraction for me was the 3 inch, 920,000 pixel LCD. A massive improvement on the 20D, it really is bright, clear and sharp, with excellent colour rendition, and only in very bright sunlight does it fail to impress. The new Digic4 processor is very impressive offering high definition and very low noise even at high ISO levels. Combined with the more than adequate 15.1 megapixel sensor, the unit delivers remarkable images.
I found the buttons, dials and controls both sturdy and accessible, and, unlike the 20D, much more intuitive. The menu is also much more clearly and systematically laid out. The 50D is slightly faster, has more features and a burst rate of 6.3fps while the 500D gives just 3.4fps. Am I bothered? No! I have rarely used it and when I have 3.4fps has always been quite enough.
The real drawback for me was paying a relatively high price for HD video. It simply did not attract me at all - I am a 'stills man'! Or am I? I've had so much fun recording movies, even in very low light levels, I don't understand how I have managed without it! My neighbour, the worse for wine, singing along to Kathy Kirby at a recent street party had the rest of us in tears! I'm still considering blackmail!
Are there faults? Well, I haven't found any but I'm not a pro. As with all DSLR's, the lenses do make a difference. I've only the two, but I can see the difference in image quality. I only wish I could justify buying (or even afford!) L series lenses. But that's just being picky, toys for the boys! I'm a semi-serious amateur and I think the 500D is great.
All my research pointed me to the 500D, or the Nikon D90. It would have been a real dilemma had I not already had Canon lenses as there really does not seem to be much to choose between the two.
As a footnote, I should mention that I also bought a Lowepro split camera case/ruck sac combination which accommodates the 500D, spare lens, battery, cleaning bits, and so on, whilst giving lots of space for day trip paraphernalia and this has solved lots of transport problems.
Review ID: 10000000013316079

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.