
Expensive, but excellent low light and fast action lens
Review created: 15/03/09(updated 14/04/09)
3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
The lens was purchased to cover the wide to short tele region on APS-C format camera with intention of upgrading to full frame. I have previously tried several alternatives which I will also briefly cover. Overall, this lens is a clear winner regardless the price. It is sharp and fast, exactly what was needed. The lens has been designed to be used wide open, unless greater depth of field is required.
+ The lens is sharp at f/2.8, and best in the 28-60mm region. Stopping down mainly improves corners.
+ The colours and bokeh are outstanding
+ The lens resolves really well and doesn't loose detail
+ Full weather-sealing ensures lens stays clean and dry.
+ USM focus system is extremely accurate and lightning fast
+ Comes with lens hood
+ sharpening works really well
- Weight is just within my limits, it is a little large and may require a larger camera bag. Hand holding this lens is harder than lighter lenses of around 600g weight.
- no IS
- DOF is still quite wide for portraits
- f/2.8 can be still marginal for most indoor applications and may require flash
- CA is well controlled, but is present at 24-28mm and 70mm (correctable in raw converter)
So it is very good for most midrange photos including landscapes, people, products and events. It complements longer 70-200mm zooms really well.
*ALTERNATIVES*
The other similar lens from Canon is 24-105mm f/4L IS zoom with more useful range. The IS is really attractive, but 24-70mm has less distortion on full frame at 24mm. It may be a close call though depending on applications.
Sigma also makes 24-70mm zoom. All copies I tried including the new HSM were very soft in the corners (APS-C) and heavily front-focused; This may be less of an issue with newer cameras that feature AF microadjustment, but corner softness, haziness and lack of contrast are hard to correct.
Tamron makes 28-75mm f/2.8 lens, and there are second hand Tokina 28-70mm f/2.6-2.8 (f/2.8 SV is the newer inferior version) copies on ebay. The latter is probably the best of the pack judging from other reviews, however I haven't tried either one.
For portraiture and studio work, primes are a much better option, including 50mm, 85mm, 100mm, 135mm and 200mm.
If the only aim is to take day out photos, or lightweight holiday kit is required (i.e. typical consumer use), Nikon D60 18-55mm VR kit is more appropriate at a fraction of cost, and at f/5.6 will give comparable results. For indoor shooting SB-600 can take care of the rest. I am sorry I can't recommend the corresponding Canon kit due to extremely poor kit lenses. *Canon 24-70mm is a highly specialised lens, that can take low light and action shots.*
Overall, I am very happy with the image quality of this lens with some reservations about the weight and the limited range.
Review ID: 10000000011166222

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.